Developing a machine learning (ML) algorithm in claims data to identify anaphylaxis, a rare, serious drug or vaccine induced outcomeEnterprise Analytics Core domain(s): Vaccines, CarelonRx Summary Hui-Lee Wong*, Mao Hu*, Cindy Ke Zhou, Patricia C Lloyd, Kandace L Amend, Daniel C Beachler, Alex Secora, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Yun Lu, Yue Wu, Rachel P Ogilvie, Christian Reich, Djeneba Audrey Djibo, Zhiruo Wan, John D Seeger, Sandia Akhtar, Yixin Jiao, Yoganand Chillarige, Rose Do, John Hornberger, Joyce Obidi, Richard Forshee, Azadeh Shoaibi, Steven A Anderson Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in the USA: a cohort study in claims databases. Lancet. 202 ; 399:2191–99. Carelon Research project team: Daniel C. Beachler, Ramya Avula, Shiva Chaudhary, Brian Greenwald, Navyatha Namburu, Ramin Riahi, Priyanka Sagare, Grace Stockbower, Shiva Vojjala
Traditional analytical methods are no match for anaphylaxis, a rare but serious reaction to certain drugs and vaccines that can be difficult to find in a sea of administrative claims data. An exceptionally accurate algorithm developed by Carelon Research (formerly HealthCore, Inc.) may be able to help identify drug- and vaccine-induced anaphylaxis within the Elevance Health population.
Background
Leveraged the power of machine learning to develop an accurate algorithm to identify conditions in administrative claims that are not easily identified.
Methods
A conventional algorithm for anaphylaxis cases was developed via anaphylaxis diagnosis codes or relevant signs and symptoms. This algorithm was applied to adults with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) within the Carelon Research database containing administrative claims from 2016 to 2018. Clinical experts adjudicated anaphylaxis case status from redacted medical records. We used confirmed case status as an outcome for predictive models to identify predictors and estimate the probability of confirmed anaphylaxis.
Results
The model’s algorithm was very accurate and was able to correctly identify anaphylaxis cases and exclude most non-cases.
Key takeaways
Publication
*Carelon Research Associate at the time of the study.
For more information on a specific study or to connect with the Actionable Insights Committee, contact us at [email protected].This study was conducted by Carelon Research (formerly HealthCore, Inc.), a subsidiary of Elevance Health, and funded by Sanofi. Dissemination and sharing of the Newsletter is limited to Elevance Health and its subsidiaries and included findings and implications are for Elevance Health and its affiliates’ internal use only.
Hub Domain(s): Immunology, oncology, costs of care, IngenioRx, policy guidance
Summary:
Hub Domain(s): COVID, member experience
Summary:
Figure 1: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on accessing healthcare/mental healthcare

An exploration into use of immunoglobulins (IG), costly blood-derived products…

Obtaining access to healthcare, coverage, and medications can feel like an…

Compared to chemoimmunotherapy, first line use of ibrutinib in patients with…

"Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio!"
"Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi."
"Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis!"